“School of Philosophy”

Back to Papers Home
Back to Papers of School of Philosophy

Paper   IPM / Philosophy / 12687
School of Analytic Philosophy
  Title:   Skepticism and Varieties of Transcendental Argument
  Author(s):  Hamid Vahid
  Status:   Published
  Journal: Logos & Episteme
  No.:  3
  Vol.:  II
  Year:  2011
  Pages:   395-411
  Supported by:  IPM
Transcendental arguments have been described as disclosing the necessary conditions of the possibility of phenomena as diverse as experience, self-knowledge and language. Although many theorists saw them as powerful means to combat varieties of skepticism, this optimism gradually waned as many such arguments turned out, on examination, to deliver much less than was originally thought. In this paper, I distinguish between two species of transcendental arguments claiming that they do not actually constitute distinct forms of reasoning by showing how they collapse into more familiar inferences. I then turn to the question of their epistemic potentials which I argue to be a function of both their types as well as their targets. Finally, these claims are reinforced by uncovering links between certain recent claims about the efficacy of transcendental arguments and the so-called Moore�??s paradox.

Download TeX format
back to top
scroll left or right